The Hidden Battle Behind MLB’s Looming Labor War

ProximityLocal
Written By Tim Hanlon

Maureen Carney/Eyes Of A Generation

The looming Major League Baseball labor showdown will not just be a fight over salaries, payrolls and a potential strike or lockout. Those issues will dominate the headlines, but the real battle is about something much larger: the collapse of the regional sports network model, the future of local television and who controls baseball’s next generation of media revenue.

For more than three decades, local television served as one of the central pillars of MLB’s economic structure. Teams sold their broadcast rights to regional sports networks, those networks collected lucrative carriage fees from cable operators and franchises benefited from a predictable revenue stream that helped fuel rising valuations and escalating player salaries. The system was imperfect, creating enormous financial advantages for clubs in larger markets, but the abundance of the cable bundle allowed those disparities to remain manageable.

That foundation has now begun to erode.

The RSN Collapse

The decline of the RSN business was years in the making, driven by cord-cutting, changing consumer habits and the broader disruption of the traditional pay-TV ecosystem. But the collapse accelerated with the bankruptcy of Diamond Sports Group, the unraveling of Bally Sports and Warner Bros. Discovery’s decision to exit the regional sports network business. A revenue engine that once appeared almost permanent suddenly became one of the biggest strategic challenges facing professional sports.

The irony is that baseball enters this uncertain media environment from a position of considerable strength. Attendance has improved, national ratings have stabilized and rule changes such as the pitch clock have helped modernize the product. The sport’s biggest stars are generating renewed attention, while rule changes and expanded storytelling efforts have helped MLB rebuild momentum after years of concern about its cultural relevance.

The problem is not that fans no longer want local baseball. The problem is that the traditional system for monetizing that interest is breaking apart.

A Royals broadcast remains valuable in Kansas City. A Twins broadcast remains valuable in Minneapolis. An Orioles broadcast remains valuable in Baltimore. The audience for local baseball did not disappear when RSNs weakened; the distribution infrastructure that transformed that audience into billions of dollars in television revenue did.

That distinction explains why MLB has increasingly moved into managing local media operations itself. As RSNs failed, the league began assuming responsibility for production and distribution for more teams, expanded direct-to-consumer offerings and gained greater control over local broadcast inventory that historically belonged entirely to individual clubs.

What began as a defensive response to the RSN crisis increasingly looks like a strategic repositioning for the future.

The Push For Control

The reason is straightforward: the economics of streaming reward scale.

Companies entering sports media are unlikely to want dozens of separate local negotiations with individual franchises. They want large, simplified rights packages that can attract broad audiences and justify significant investment. MLB’s traditional local rights structure was built for the cable era; a more centralized model is designed for the streaming era.

The challenge is not eliminating local relevance; it is finding a way to package local passion into a media product that fits a national streaming economy.

That does not mean a fully centralized system is imminent. Existing agreements involving valuable local media assets such as the Dodgers’ SportsNet LA or the Yankees’ YES Network create significant obstacles. Large-market franchises have little incentive to voluntarily surrender advantages they spent decades building.

But the direction of travel is clear. Baseball is trying to determine how much control it should have over local rights and how those rights can be packaged more effectively in a fragmented media environment.

Follow The Revenue

This is where the labor negotiations become far more complicated than a traditional fight over player salaries.

The owners’ push for a salary cap cannot be separated from the broader restructuring of baseball’s revenue model. If MLB moves toward greater centralization of local media rights and broader revenue sharing, owners will have a stronger argument that payroll structures should also become more standardized across the league.

From ownership’s perspective, the logic is straightforward: a more equitable distribution of revenues should create a more equitable competitive environment.

From the Players Association’s perspective, the issue is much different. The MLBPA has historically viewed salary caps as a fundamental threat to player earning potential, and any media restructuring that strengthens the argument for a cap will be viewed as part of a larger attempt to reshape baseball’s economics in ownership’s favor.

That is why the local television issue matters so much. The fight over media rights is not separate from the fight over compensation. It is the foundation beneath it.

The challenge for MLB is that there are competing interests on the ownership side as well. Smaller-market clubs have obvious incentives to support greater revenue sharing, while large-market teams that have built enormously valuable local media businesses may be reluctant to dilute those advantages.

The result is a negotiation that extends well beyond owners versus players. It is also a debate between large and small markets, between legacy television economics and streaming economics, and between a business model that defined baseball for decades and one that has yet to fully emerge.

The conventional narrative around the next MLB labor battle will focus on salaries, payrolls and the possibility of a work stoppage. Those issues will dominate the headlines, but they are increasingly downstream from a much larger strategic challenge: rebuilding the economic foundation that has supported baseball for more than three decades.

The RSN era is ending. Baseball’s next great question is not simply how the sport divides existing revenues, but who controls the next generation of local media rights — and whether MLB can build a new streaming-era economic model before the coming labor fight forces the issue.

Local News To Peruse

Tim Hanlon

Tim Hanlon is the Founder & CEO of the Chicago-based Vertere Group, LLC – a boutique strategic consulting and advisory firm focused on helping today’s most forward-leaning media companies, brands, entrepreneurs, and investors benefit from rapidly changing technological advances in marketing, media and consumer communications.

Next

Beyond Scale: Media Value Comes From Understanding Why People Show Up